An independent military prevention research collaborative.

Mission Prevent& Protect MP2

Better evidence. Earlier action. Stronger protection for servicemembers.

Harmful behaviors take lives, fracture families and teams, and erode military readiness. MP2 brings leaders, practitioners, and researchers together to understand risk, strengthen protective conditions, and help formations act before a crisis becomes a tragedy.

Unit-level insight · Human judgment · Preventive action

Find the signal understand the unit focus support.

Protect people

Strengthen teams

Support leaders

Advance prevention

Protect servicemembers before harm escalates.

Military leaders are often asked to respond after a harmful event has already occurred. Prevention starts earlier: recognizing changing conditions inside units, listening closely, and connecting people to the right support at the right time.

Our purpose: connect military leaders, researchers, clinicians, prevention practitioners, and data experts to generate, test, preserve, and translate evidence that helps formations prevent suicide and other harmful behaviors before crises occur.

The technology can surface a signal. People must supply context, care, accountability, and judgment.

See sooner

Move from reaction to anticipation.

Use responsible, unit-level evidence to help leaders recognize patterns they might otherwise miss.

Act wisely

Turn warning into understanding.

Pair analysis with conversations, local knowledge, and professional expertise before choosing a response.

Learn continuously

Make prevention cumulative.

Study what helps, what does not, and what causes unintended harm—then share those lessons with the field.

Connect evidence to action.

MP2 is built to help a dispersed field work as a learning system—rigorous enough for researchers, practical enough for leaders, and accountable to the people it exists to protect.

01

Connect

Bring together military leaders, practitioners, researchers, clinicians, data stewards, and people with lived experience around shared prevention problems.

02

Study

Sponsor rigorous pilots, replications, and evaluations that examine outcomes, implementation, and unintended effects.

03

Preserve

Keep useful measures, methods, code, and findings accessible so hard-won learning survives turnover and can be tested again.

04

Equip

Translate credible research into decision briefs, convenings, and tools that help leaders focus attention and support responsibly.

A signal matters only when it leads to care.

MP2 grows from years of field research on harmful behaviors, organizational culture, readiness, and human performance. Across that work, one lesson is consistent: data should inform leadership, never replace it.

Unit-level warning signals can help leaders direct scarce time and attention. But a responsible prevention system also requires diagnosis, tailored support, follow-through, and honest evaluation.

  1. 1
    SeeUse minimum-necessary data to recognize changing unit conditions.
  2. 2
    UnderstandCombine evidence with leader sensing and local context.
  3. 3
    SupportFocus care and resources on the unit’s actual needs.
  4. 4
    LearnMeasure outcomes, burdens, uncertainty, and unintended effects.

Protect people in the work—and through the work.

Credible prevention demands rigorous methods, explicit limits, careful stewardship, and respect for every person represented in the evidence.

Prevention, not prediction

Study modifiable organizational conditions and protective factors—not who an algorithm claims may cause harm.

Support, not surveillance

Use unit-level or deidentified information by default. Never build individual risk scores for adverse personnel action.

Minimum necessary data

Collect and retain only what a responsible research or prevention purpose truly requires.

Transparent evidence

Share uncertainty, null results, model drift, implementation failure, and credible alternative explanations.

Independent inquiry

Protect research questions and findings from sponsor, donor, vendor, or command pressure.

Human judgment

Put leaders, practitioners, and people with lived experience at the center of interpretation and action.

The work behind the mission.

These public articles trace a practical research agenda: know the unit, find useful signals, strengthen protective conditions, and turn analysis into responsible leader action.

Modern War Institute · 2025

Protecting Soldiers, Preventing Harmful Behaviors, and Boosting Combat Readiness—with Data

The clearest statement of the prevention mission: use unit-level evidence to help leaders intervene earlier while preserving human judgment.

Read the article

SSRN working paper · 2025

Can We Predict Soldier Harmful Behaviors?

The predictive base model for understanding short-term unit-level incident patterns—not an individual risk score.

Read the paper

Military Review · 2024

Taking a Data-Centric Approach to Unit Readiness

A field-tested method for turning operational questions and messy data into decision-relevant insight.

Read the article

Military Review · 2025

What Can We Learn from Measuring Unit Culture?

Evidence on how culture, inspiration, and leader behavior relate to cohesion, performance, and harmful behaviors.

Read the article

Modern War Institute · 2026

Can Biometric Data Make Units More Combat Ready?

A case for using human-performance data carefully to inform training, recovery, and leader decisions.

Read the article